Management of VBAC should be started from antenatal phase, that is before delivery. During this phase, a woman with previous history of cesarean section, who is a suitable candidate for VBAC, is counseled on the option of planned VBAC and the other alternative option of elective repeat cesarean section for mode of delivery. A final decision for mode of delivery should be agreed between the woman and her obstetrician before the expected / planned delivery date, ideally by 36 weeks of gestation. Thus, ideally the woman should be counseled earlier so that she has enough time to understand all the information given to her, to consider both options and finally to make her decision.
Women considering their option for birth should be informed that, overall, chances of successful planned VBAC are 72 - 76%. They should be informed about the factors associated with successful VBAC as well as factors associated with unsuccessful VBAC - which unsuccessful VBAC means that the woman has to proceed with emergency cesarean section for delivery. They also should be counseled on the contraindication, specific risks and benefits of VBAC.
The consultant will do details and thorough assessment to determine wether the woman is contraindicated or not for VBAC. Women with contraindication of VBAC is not suitable for VBAC, thus they are recommended to give birth by ERCS (elective repeated cesarean section).
Factor associated with successful VBAC mainly is previous vaginal birth, particularly previous successful VBAC. Meanwhile, factors that associated with unsuccessful VBAC include: 1)induced labor. 2)no previous vaginal birth. 3)BMI greater than 30. 4)previous cesarean section for dystocia. 5) VBAC at or after 41 weeks gestation. 6)birth weight greater than 4kg. 7)previous preterm cesarean birth. 8)cervical dilatation at admission less than 4 cm. 9)less than 2 years of previous cesarean birth. 10) advanced maternal age, and so on.
Women considering the option for VBAC should as well be told that 1)planned VBAC carries a risk of uterine rupture of 22 - 74/10,000. There is virtually no risk of uterine rupture in woman undergoing ERCS. 2)planned VBAC compared to ERCS carries around 1% additional risk of either blood transfusion and endometritis. 3)planned VBAC carries around 2 - 3/10,000 additional risk of birth related perinatal death compared to ERCS. The absolute risk of such birth related perinatal loss is comparable to the risk for women having their 1st birth. 4)planned VBAC carries an 8/10,000 risk of infant developing HIE (hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy). 5)planned VBAC reduce the risk that their baby will have respiratory problems after birth. Rates are 2 - 3% with planned VBAC and 3 - 4% with ERCS. 6)risk of anesthetic complication is extremely low, irrespective of wether they opt for planned VBAC or ERCS. 7)ERCS may increase risk of serious complication in future pregnancies.
No comments:
Post a Comment